Portal de investigação
Reliability and Validity of Computerized Adventitious Respiratory Sounds in People with Bronchiectasis
Data de publicação:
Autores da FMUP
Participantes de fora da FMUP
- Herrero-Cortina, B
- Francín-Gallego, M
- Sáez-Pérez, JA
- San Miguel-Pagola, M
- Anoro-Abenoza, L
- Gómez-González, C
- Montero-Marco, J
- Charlo-Bernardos, M
- Altarribas-Bolsa, E
- Pérez-Trullén, A
Unidades de investigação
Abstract
Background: Computerized adventitious respiratory sounds (ARS), such as crackles and wheezes, have been poorly explored in bronchiectasis, especially their measurement properties. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of ARS in bronchiectasis. Methods: Respiratory sounds were recorded twice at 4 chest locations on 2 assessment sessions (7 days apart) in people with bronchiectasis and daily sputum expectoration. The total number of crackles, number of wheezes and wheeze occupation rate (%) were the parameters extracted. Results: 28 participants (9 men; 62 +/- 12 y) were included. Total number of crackles and wheezes showed moderate within-day (ICC 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-0.94; ICC 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-0.93) and between-day reliability (ICC 0.70, 95% CI 0.43-0.86; ICC 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-0.90) considering all chest locations and both respiratory phases; wheeze occupation rate showed moderate within-day reliability (ICC 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-0.93), but poor between-day reliability (ICC 0.71, 95% CI 0.33-0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic bias, but wide limits of agreement, particularly in the between-days analysis. All ARS parameters correlated moderately with the amount of daily sputum expectoration (r > 0.4; p < 0.05). No other significant correlations were observed. Conclusion: ARS presented moderate reliability and were correlated with the daily sputum expectoration in bronchiectasis. The use of sequential measurements may be an option to achieve greater accuracy when ARS are used to monitor or assess the effects of physiotherapy interventions in this population.
Dados da publicação
- ISSN/ISSNe:
- 2077-0383, 2077-0383
- Tipo:
- Article
- Páginas:
- -
- DOI:
- 10.3390/jcm11247509
- Link para outro recurso:
- www.scopus.com
Journal of Clinical Medicine MDPI AG
Citações Recebidas na Scopus: 2
Documentos
- Não há documentos
Filiações
Keywords
- bronchiectasis; adventitious respiratory sounds; crackles; wheezes; reliability; validity
Proyectos asociados
Prevalence and Characterisation of Asthma Patients According to Disease Severity in Portugal (EPI-ASTHMA) - NCT05169619
Investigador Principal: João de Almeida Lopes da Fonseca
Estudo Clínico Observacional (EPI-ASTHMA) . AstraZeneca . 2021
Effect of a Mobile App on Improving Asthma Control in Adolescents and Adults With Persistent Asthma: A Pilot Randomized Multicentre, Superiority Clinical Trial (mINSPIRERS) - NCT05129527
Investigador Principal: João de Almeida Lopes da Fonseca
Ensaio Clínico Académico (mINSPIRERS) . 2021
Citar a publicação
Herrero B,Francín M,Sáez JA,San Miguel M,Anoro L,Gómez C,Montero J,Charlo M,Altarribas E,Pérez A,Jácome C. Reliability and Validity of Computerized Adventitious Respiratory Sounds in People with Bronchiectasis. J. Clin. Med. 2022. 11. (24):7509. IF:3,900. (2).
