First report from the International Evaluation of Endoscopic classification Japan NBI Expert Team: International multicenter web trial

Data de publicação: 23/10/2023 Data Ahead of Print: 01/10/2023

Autores da FMUP

Mário Jorge Dinis Ribeiro

Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

Saito, Y
Sakamoto, T
Dekker, E
Pioche, M
Probst, A
Ponchon, T
Messmann, H
Matsuda, T
Ikematsu, H
Saito, S
Wada, Y
Oka, S
Sano, Y
Fujishiro, M
Murakami, Y
Ishikawa, H
Inoue, H
Tanaka, S
Tajiri, H
IEE-JNET Grp

Unidades de investigação

Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde

Abstract

ObjectivesNarrow-band imaging (NBI) contributes to real-time optical diagnosis and classification of colorectal lesions. The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) was introduced in 2011. The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic accuracy of JNET when applied by European and Japanese endoscopists not familiar with this classification.MethodsThis study was conducted by 36 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and 49 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) non-JNET endoscopists using still images of 150 lesions. For each lesion, nonmagnified white-light, nonmagnified NBI, and magnified NBI images were presented. In the magnified NBI, the evaluation area was designated by region of interest (ROI). The endoscopists scored histological prediction for each lesion.ResultsIn ESGE members, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 73.3%, 94.7%, and 93.0% for JNET Type 1; 53.0%, 64.9%, and 62.1% for Type 2A; 43.9%, 67.7%, and 55.1% for Type 2B; and 38.1%, 93.7%, and 85.1% for Type 3.When Type 2B and 3 were considered as one category of cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating high-grade dysplasia and cancer from the others were 59.9%, 72.5%, and 63.8%, respectively. These trends were the same for JGES endoscopists.ResultsIn ESGE members, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 73.3%, 94.7%, and 93.0% for JNET Type 1; 53.0%, 64.9%, and 62.1% for Type 2A; 43.9%, 67.7%, and 55.1% for Type 2B; and 38.1%, 93.7%, and 85.1% for Type 3.When Type 2B and 3 were considered as one category of cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating high-grade dysplasia and cancer from the others were 59.9%, 72.5%, and 63.8%, respectively. These trends were the same for JGES endoscopists.ConclusionThe diagnostic accuracy of the JNET classification was similar between ESGE and JGES and considered to be sufficient for JNET Type 1. On the other hand, the accuracy for Types 2 and 3 is not sufficient; however, JNET 2B lesions should be resected en bloc due to the risk of cancers and JNET 3 can be treated by surgery due to its high specificity.

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:: 0915-5635, 1443-1661
Tipo:: Article
Páginas:: 591-599
DOI:: 10.1111/den.14682
Link para outro recurso:: www.scopus.com

Documentos

Não há documentos

Métricas

Filiações

Keywords

ESGE (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy); E-test; JGES (Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society); JNET (Japan NBI Expert Team); narrow-band imaging (NBI)