Do surrogates predict patient preferences more accurately after a physician-led discussion about advance directives? A randomized controlled trial

Data de publicação: Data Ahead of Print:

Autores da FMUP

  • Cristina Maria Nogueira Da Costa Santos

    Autor

  • Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

    Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

  • Martins, CS
  • Sousa, I
  • Barros, C
  • Pires, A
  • Castro, L

Unidades de investigação

Abstract

Background: Caregivers frequently assume the role of surrogate decision-makers but often are unable to accurately predict patients' preferences. This trial aims to find if the use of the Advance Directives documents as a communication tool, improves the agreement between patients and caregivers. Methods: This trial occurred in a palliative care service of a Portuguese hospital center. A prospective, single-blinded, controlled, randomized trial, enrolling patients and caregivers as a dyad was conducted. Participants individually fulfilled an Advance Directive document, in which patients reported their end-of-life preferences and caregivers reported their decisions as patients' health surrogates. Dyads were randomly assigned to the Intervention or the Control group, in which the physician respectively promoted an open discussion about patients'Advance Directives or evaluated patients' clinical condition. Caregivers' Advance Directives as surrogates were collected one month later. Proportions of agreement and Cohen's K were used to access agreement and reliability, respectively, between the dyads. Results: Results from 58 dyads were analyzed. We observed an improvement in agreement between the caregivers' answers and the patients'wishes on two-thirds (8/12) of the answers, in the Intervention group, contrasting to one-quarter (3/12) of the answers, in the Control group, despite statistical significance in differences wasn't obtained. Conclusions: Although not reaching statistical significance, the results suggest that discussions of advance directives with physicians may lead to better prepared surrogates.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:
1472-684X, 1472-684X

BMC Palliative Care  BioMed Central Ltd.

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
122-122
Link para outro recurso:
www.scopus.com

Citações Recebidas na Web of Science: 2

Citações Recebidas na Scopus: 4

Documentos

  • Não há documentos

Métricas

Filiações mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Palliative Care; Advance Directives; Caregivers; Decision-making

Proyectos asociados

COVID-19: Monitorizar e planear com base no risco.

Investigador Principal: Cristina Maria Nogueira da Costa Santos

Estudo Observacional Académico (COVID-19) . 2020

A ameaça da não-vacinação na sociedade digital e da desinformação

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico (desinformação) . 2020

Autonomia ou beneficência - que princípio prevalece entre os prestadores de cuidados de saúde portugueses?

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2020

Spiritual advocacy in palliative care: A moral agency approach

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

Ameaça aos princípios bioéticos na pratica médica no Brasil: Duas Décadas dos Processos ético-profissionais (1988-2008)

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2019

Citar a publicação

Partilhar a publicação