Gastric cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Data de publicação: Data Ahead of Print:

Autores da FMUP

  • Pedro Filipe Vieira Pimentel Nunes

    Autor

  • Mário Jorge Dinis Ribeiro

    Autor

  • Diogo Miguel Pereira Libânio Monteiro

    Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

  • Faria, L
  • Silva, JC
  • Rodríguez-Carrasco, M

Unidades de investigação

Abstract

Background and aims Gastric cancer (GC) screening is recommended in high-risk populations, although screening methods and intervals vary. In intermediate-risk populations, screening through esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) may be considered depending on local resources. The aim of this study was to compare GC screening methods regarding effect on mortality, diagnostic yield and adherence. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis including studies evaluating population-based GC screening. Search was conducted in three online databases (MEDLINE, Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov), along with manual search. Results Forty-four studies were included. Studies in upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) demonstrated that GC screening was associated with significantly lower GC mortality rates (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.55 - 0.73). Benefits on mortality were also found in EGD and serum pepsinogen (PG) studies. EGD was associated with significantly higher GC (0.55%, 95% CI 0.39 - 0.75%) and early-GC (EGC) detection rates (0.48%, 95% CI 0.34 - 0.65%) when compared to UGIS (GC 0.19%, 95% CI 0.10 - 0.31%; EGC 0.08%, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.13%) and PG (GC 0.10%, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.16%; EGC 0.10%, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.19%). Non-invasive methods tended to higher adherence rates when compared to EGD. Regardless of the screening method, individualized recruitment performed better. Discussion Screening positively impacted GC mortality rates. EGD was associated with higher diagnostic yield, while UGIS and PG tended to higher adherence rates. Screening uptake was predominantly impacted by recruitment strategies independently of the adopted method.

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:
0036-5521, 1502-7708

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology  Informa Healthcare

Tipo:
Review
Páginas:
1178-1188
Link para outro recurso:
www.scopus.com

Citações Recebidas na Web of Science: 6

Citações Recebidas na Scopus: 8

Documentos

  • Não há documentos

Métricas

Filiações mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer; cancer screening; preventive medicine; early detection of cancer; gastrointestinal endoscopy

Proyectos asociados

Individualized gastric adenocarcinoma early diagnosis and improved patients survival: from liquid biopsies to a comprehensive management approach. (IMAGE)

Investigador Principal: Mário Jorge Dinis Ribeiro

Estudo Clínico Académico (IMAGE) . AgênciaD&C . 2021

Effectiveness of endoscopic resection of colonic lesions > 20mm

Investigador Principal: Mário Jorge Dinis Ribeiro

Estudo Clínico Académico (Colonic lesions) . 2020

How endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal lesions is being implemented? Results from an international survey

Investigador Principal: Pedro Filipe Vieira Pimentel Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico (ENDOS) . 2020

Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer

Investigador Principal: Pedro Filipe Vieira Pimentel Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2020

Citar a publicação

Partilhar a publicação