Reverse left ventricular remodeling after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Data de publicação: 01/01/2024

Autores da FMUP

• Bernardo Manuel De Sousa Pinto

  Autor

• Francisca Almeida Saraiva

  Autor

• Joaquim Adelino Correia Ferreira Leite Moreira

  Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

• Sousa Nunes F.
• Amaral Marques C.
• Isabel Pinho A.
• Beco A.
• Ricardo Silva J.
• Macedo F.
• Sousa C.

Unidades de investigação

• Cirurgia e Fisiologia

• Laboratório Associado RISE- Rede de Investigação em Saúde

  

  Investigador

  Fernando Carlos De Landér Schmitt

• Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde

• RISE-Health

  

  Investigador

  Fernando Carlos De Landér Schmitt

Abstract

Reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after aortic valve replacement (AVR), in patients with aortic stenosis, is well-documented as an important prognostic factor. With this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to characterize the response of the unloaded LV after AVR. We searched on MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science for studies reporting echocardiographic findings before and at least 1 month after AVR for the treatment of aortic stenosis. In total, 1,836 studies were identified and 1,098 were screened for inclusion. The main factors of interest were structural and dynamic measures of the LV and aortic valve. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to compute standardized mean differences (SMD) between follow-up and baseline values for each outcome. Twenty-seven studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding 11,751 patients. AVR resulted in reduced mean aortic gradient (SMD: (Formula presented.) mmHg, 95% CI: (Formula presented.) to (Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)), LV mass (SMD: (Formula presented.) g, 95% CI: (Formula presented.) to (Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)), end-diastolic LV diameter (SMD: (Formula presented.) mm, 95% CI: (Formula presented.) to (Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)), end-diastolic LV volume (SMD: (Formula presented.) ml, 95% CI: (Formula presented.) to 3.51, (Formula presented.)), increased effective aortic valve area (SMD: 1.10 cm2, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.20, (Formula presented.)), and LV ejection fraction (SMD: 2.35%, 95% CI: 1.31 to 3.40%, (Formula presented.)). Our results characterize the extent to which reverse remodeling is expected to occur after AVR. Notably, in our study, reverse remodeling was documented as soon as 1 month after AVR. 2024 Sousa Nunes, Amaral Marques, Isabel Pinho, Sousa-Pinto, Beco, Ricardo Silva, Saraiva, Macedo, Leite-Moreira and Sousa.

Keywords

• aortic stenosis; aortic valve; aortic valve replacement; body surface; diabetes mellitus; echocardiography; follow up; heart left ventricle; heart left ventricle ejection fraction; heart left ventricle enddiastolic volume; heart left ventricle mass; heart ventricle remodeling; human; hypertension; ischemic heart disease; left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; maximum likelihood method; meta analysis; New York Heart Association class; outcome assessment; quality control; Review; risk assessment; systematic review; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; univariate analysis