Portuguese Advance Directives-a twist against futility? A cross sectional study

Data de publicação: Data Ahead of Print:

Autores da FMUP

  • Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

    Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

  • Martins, Catarina Sampaio

Unidades de investigação

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advance Directive documents allow citizens to choose the treatments they want for endof -life care without considering therapeutic futility. OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients' and caregivers' answers to Advance Directives and understand their expectations regarding their decisions. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study analyzed participants' answers to a previously published trial, conceived to test the document's efficacy as a communication tool. METHODS: Sixty palliative patients and 60 caregivers (n = 120) registered their preferences in the Advance Directive document and expressed their expectations regarding whether to receive the chosen treatments. RESULTS: In the patient and caregiver groups, 30% and 23.3% wanted to receive cardiorespiratory resuscitation; 23.3% and 25% wanted to receive artificial organ support; and 40% and 35% chose to receive artificial feeding and hydration, respectively. The participants ignored the concept of therapeutic futility and expected to receive invasive treatments. The concept of therapeutic futility should be addressed and discussed with both the patients and caregivers. Legal Advanced Directive documents should be made clear to reduce misinterpretations and potential legal conflicts. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest that all citizens should be clarified regarding the futility concept before filling out the Advance Directives and propose a grammatical change in the document, replacing the phrase ``Health Care to Receive / Not to Receive'' with the sentence ``Health Care to Accept / Refuse'' so that patients cannot demand treatments, but instead accept or refuse the proposed therapeutic plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05090072 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05090072.

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:
1516-3180, 1806-9460

Sao Paulo Medical Journal  Associacao Paulista de Medicina

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
-
Link para outro recurso:
www.scopus.com

Documentos

  • Não há documentos

Métricas

Filiações mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Advance Directives; Medical Futility; Palliative Care; Legislation as topic; Health Literacy

Proyectos asociados

A ameaça da não-vacinação na sociedade digital e da desinformação

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico (desinformação) . 2020

Critérios Éticos na Admissão a Cuidados Intensivos – COVID-19

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Autonomia ou beneficência - que princípio prevalece entre os prestadores de cuidados de saúde portugueses?

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2020

Formação em Bioética nos Cursos de Medicina dos Países da Lusofonia

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2023

A bioética na medicina de fim ou de meio na intervenção estética

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2023

Avaliação médica biopsicossocial de pessoas com deficiência a partir da aplicação IFBRA: há conflito com os princípios bioéticos na avaliação de Servidores públicos nomeados em concurso público com deficiência?

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2023

The Right to Be Forgotten Regarding Health Data

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Spiritual advocacy in palliative care: A moral agency approach

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

Ameaça aos princípios bioéticos na pratica médica no Brasil: Duas Décadas dos Processos ético-profissionais (1988-2008)

Investigador Principal: Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2019

Citar a publicação

Partilhar a publicação