The applicability of the “surprise question” as a prognostic tool in patients with severe chronic comorbidities in a university teaching outpatient setting

Autores da FMUP

• Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

  Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

• Lin C.A.
• Pires P.P.
• Freitas L.V.
• Reis P.V.S.
• Silva F.D.
• Herbst L.G.
• Lin C.J.
• Nunes M.P.T.

Unidades de investigação

• Laboratório Associado RISE- Rede de Investigação em Saúde

  

  Investigador

  Fernando Carlos De Landér Schmitt

• Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde

• RISE-Health

  

  Investigador

  Fernando Carlos De Landér Schmitt

Abstract

Background: Life expectancy in recent decades has increased the prevalence of chronic diseases in the population, requiring an approach to new health topics, such as discussions on quality of life and expectations about death and dying. The concept of advance directives (ADs) gives individuals the opportunity to make known their decisions about the treatments they would like to receive at the end of life. Despite the recognition of relevance in clinical practice, the applicability of the concept presents challenges, including establishing the appropriate prognosis for each patient and the ideal time to approach the patient. Some prognostic tools were developed, such as the surprise question (SQ): “Would you be surprised if your patient died in 12 months?”, which is used in some clinical settings to predict patient deaths and to make decisions regarding ADs. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the behavior of second-year resident physicians (PGY-2) when the SQ was applied. Method: In our observational study, from July 1, 2016, to February 28, 2017, (PGY-2) in the Internal Medicine Residency Program (IMRP) applied SQ to all patients with multiple and varied chronic no communicable comorbidities, who were followed up at the general medicine outpatient clinic (GMOC) of a tertiary university hospital in São Paulo- Brazil. The frequency of the outcome (death or non-death within 12 months) was analyzed by correlating it with the clinical data (impact of the studied variables). Results: Eight hundred forty patients entered the study. Fitfty-two of them (6.2%) died within one year. PGY-2 predicted that two hundred and fourteen patients (25.5% of total) would die within a year (answer No to SQ), of which, 32 (14.9%) did so. The correct residents’ prognosis for the subgroup of 626 patients (answer “Yes” to SQ) was NPV = 96.8% (CI = 95.4%-98.2%) and PPV = 14.9% (CI 10.1%-19, 6%). Answering “Yes” to SQ correlated negatively to addressing AD while the outcomes death and the answer No to SQ were positively correlated, according to the number of comorbidities. Conclusion: The SQ, in addition to care, contributed to health education, communication and care planning shared by the doctor and patient. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

• Brazil; Humans; Outpatients; Palliative Care; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Brazil; epidemiology; human; outpatient; palliative therapy; prognosis; prospective study; quality of life