STABILISE for acute type B aortic dissection

Data de publicação: Data Ahead of Print:

Autores da FMUP

  • Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues De Almeida

    Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

  • Cotao, Tatiana
  • Sousa, Joel

Unidades de investigação

Abstract

Introduction: Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) is an extended downstream endovascular management technique for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), that aimed to achieve complete aortic remodeling. This systematic review aimed to assess the early and mid-term clinical outcomes with STABILISE in the management of TBAD. Evidence acquisition: A literature search was performed on the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases, which returned 195 studies. Five studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms. Evidence synthesis: In total, one hundred patients with acute or subacute TBAD managed with STABILISE were included. All studies reported a technical success of 100%. Thirty-day mortality was estimated at 4% (4/100) with no further deaths documented during an estimated mean follow-up of 12.7 months (range 12-15 months). Five percent developed spinal cord ischemia and another 5% developed visceral artery occlusions. One case of aortic rupture during time of balloon inflation was reported. R are complications included delayed retrograde dissection (1%), aortobronchial fistula ( 1%), and renal failure ( 1%). One case of disconnection between stent-graft and bare stent was documented. Six percent of patients developed endoleak, predominately type I. Overall re-intervention rate was 21%, as reported in all studies. Complete obliteration of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 99% of patients and in the abdominal aorta in 96% of patients. Conclusions: STABILISE technique carries promising early and mid-term outcomes with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity. Excellent results on complete false lumen obliteration were observed. However, the heterogeneity among available studies' methodology does not permit firm conclusions, and further prospective analyses are needed to study the long-term outcomes of STABILISE.

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:
0392-9590, 1827-1839

International Angiology  Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
411-420
Link para outro recurso:
www.scopus.com

Documentos

  • Não há documentos

Métricas

Filiações mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Aortic dissection; Cardiology; Systematic review.

Campos de estudo

Proyectos asociados

Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Aneurysms

Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida

Estudo Clínico Académico (Aneurysms) . 2020

The role of infrared thermography in predicting diabetic foot outcomes

Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida

Estudo Clínico Académico (diabetic foot) . 2021

Endovascular solutions for type IA endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

Intermittent Claudication: Importance of Supervised Exercise Programme

Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Disease: Timing of Intervention, Procedural Outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2023

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - Strategies and Outcomes in Hostile Anatomies

Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Citar a publicação

Partilhar a publicação