An international, multispecialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document on controversial issues in the management of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis

Autores da FMUP
Participantes de fora da FMUP
- Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
- Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
- Ringleb, Peter Arthur
- Brown, Martin M.
- Dardik, Alan
- Poredos, Pavel
- Gray, William A.
- Nicolaides, Andrew N.
- Lal, Brajesh K.
- Antignani, Pier Luigi
- Borst, Gert J. de
- Cambria, Richard P.
- Loftus, Ian M.
- Lavie, Carl J.
- Blinc, Ales
- Lyden, Sean P.
- Matsumura, Jon S.
- Jezovnik, Mateja K.
- Bacharach, J. Michael
- Meschia, James F.
- Clair, Daniel G.
- Zeebregts, Clark J.
- Lanza, Gaetano
- Capoccia, Laura
- Spinelli, Francesco
- Liapis, Christos D.
- Jawien, Arkadiusz
- Parikh, Sahil A.
- Svetlikov, Alexei
- Menyhei, Gabor
- Davies, Alun H.
- Musialek, Piotr
- Roubin, Gary
- Stilo, Francesco
- Sultan, Sherif
- Proczka, Robert M.
- Faggioli, Gianluca
- Geroulakos, George
- Fernandes e Fernandes, Jose
- Ricco, Jean -Baptiste
- Saba, Luca
- Secemsky, Eric A.
- Pini, Rodolfo
- Myrcha, Piotr
- Rundek, Tatjana
- Martinelli, Ombretta
- Kakkos, Stavros K.
- Sachar, Ravish
- Goudot, Guillaume
- Schlachetzki, Felix
- Lavenson Jr, George S.
- Ricci, Stefano
- Topakiart, Raffi
- Millon, Antoine
- Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
- Silvestrini, Mauro
- Chaturvedi, Seemant
- Eckstein, Hans-Henning
- Gloviczki, Peter
- White, Christopher J.
Unidades de investigação
Abstract
Objective: Despite the publication of various national/international guidelines, several questions concerning the management of patients with asymptomatic (AsxCS) and symptomatic (SxCS) carotid stenosis remain unanswered. The aim of this international, multi -specialty, expert -based Delphi Consensus document was to address these issues to help clinicians make decisions when guidelines are unclear. Methods: Fourteen controversial topics were identified. A three -round Delphi Consensus process was performed including 61 experts. The aim of Round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions regarding these unresolved topics. In Round 2, clarifications were asked from each participant. In Round 3, the questionnaire was resent to all participants for their final vote. Consensus was reached when $75% of experts agreed on a specific response. Results: Most experts agreed that: (1) the current periprocedural/in-hospital stroke/death thresholds for performing a carotid intervention should be lowered from 6% to 4% in patients with SxCS and from 3% to 2% in patients with AsxCS; (2) the time threshold for a patient being considered ``recently symptomatic'' should be reduced from the current defi- nition of ``6 months'' to 3 months or less; (3) 80% to 99% AsxCS carries a higher risk of stroke compared with 60% to 79% AsxCS; (4) factors beyond the grade of stenosis and symptoms should be added to the indications for revascularization in AsxCS patients (eg, plaque features of vulnerability and silent infarctions on brain computed tomography scans); and (5) shunting should be used selectively, rather than always or never. Consensus could not be reached on the remaining topics due to conflicting, inadequate, or controversial evidence. Conclusions: The present international, multi -specialty expert -based Delphi Consensus document attempted to provide responses to several unanswered/unresolved issues. However, consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting areas requiring future research. (J Vasc Surg 2024;79:420-35.)
Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Dados da publicação
- ISSN/ISSNe:
- 1097-6809, 0741-5214
- Tipo:
- Review
- Páginas:
- 420-4351
- Link para outro recurso:
- www.scopus.com
Journal of Vascular Surgery Mosby Inc.
Citações Recebidas na Web of Science: 7
Citações Recebidas na Scopus: 8
Documentos
- Não há documentos
Filiações
Keywords
- Asymptomatic carotid stenosis; Delphi Consensus; Stroke; Symptomatic carotid stenosis; Transient ischemic attack
Proyectos asociados
Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Aneurysms
Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida
Estudo Clínico Académico (Aneurysms) . 2020
The role of infrared thermography in predicting diabetic foot outcomes
Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida
Estudo Clínico Académico (diabetic foot) . 2021
Endovascular solutions for type IA endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair
Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida
Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021
Intermittent Claudication: Importance of Supervised Exercise Programme
Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida
Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021
Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Disease: Timing of Intervention, Procedural Outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida
Estudo Clínico Académico . 2023
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - Strategies and Outcomes in Hostile Anatomies
Investigador Principal: Armando Amilcar Pires Mansilha Rodrigues de Almeida
Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022
Citar a publicação
Paraskevas KI,Mikhailidis DP,Ringleb PA,Brown MM,Dardik A,Poredos P,Gray WA,Nicolaides AN,Lal BK,Mansilha A,Antignani PL,Borst GJD,Cambria RP,Loftus IM,Lavie CJ,Blinc A,Lyden SP,Matsumura JS,Jezovnik MK,Bacharach JM,Meschia JF,Clair DG,Zeebregts CJ,Lanza G,Capoccia L,Spinelli F,Liapis CD,Jawien A,Parikh SA,Svetlikov A,Menyhei G,Davies AH,Musialek P,Roubin G,Stilo F,Sultan S,Proczka RM,Faggioli G,Geroulakos G,Fernandes e Fernandes J,Ricco J-,Saba L,Secemsky EA,Pini R,Myrcha P,Rundek T,Martinelli O,Kakkos SK,Sachar R,Goudot G,Schlachetzki F,Lavenson GS,Ricci S,Topakiart R,Millon A,Di V,Silvestrini M,Chaturvedi S,Eckstein H,Gloviczki P,White CJ. An international, multispecialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document on controversial issues in the management of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 2024. 79(2):p. 420-4351. IF:4,300. (1).