Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF

Data de publicação: Data Ahead of Print:

Autores da FMUP

  • Pedro Santos Silva

    Autor

  • Paulo Miguel Da Silva Pereira

    Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

  • Jardim, A
  • Pereira, J
  • Sousa, R
  • Vaz, R

Unidades de investigação

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to compare midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for treatment of patients with severe stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), focusing on dural tears rates, other complications, clinical and radiological outcomes.MethodsThis cohort study included patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (Shizas C or D) and lumbar DS who underwent MIDLIF or MIS-TLIF. Propensity score matching was done and the groups were compared regarding surgery time, length of stay, perioperative complications, clinical results and radiological outcomes, at 1 year of follow-up.ResultsThe study included initially 80 patients, and 72 patients after matching, 36 in each group. Six patients had dural tears, four in the MIDLIF group and two in the MIS-TLIF group (p = 0.67). General complication rates and reoperations were not significantly different between the groups. Good or excellent clinical was achieved in 75% of the MIDLIF patients and 72% of the MIS-TLIF patients (p = 0.91). Radiological parameters showed small but statistically significant (p < 0.01) improvements after surgery, particularly in segmental lordosis and lumbar lordosis (2.0 & DEG; and 1.7 & DEG;), while pelvic tilt and global tilt decreased (1.6 & DEG; and 2.6 & DEG;). These findings were similar for both groups.ConclusionOur study confirms that MIDLIF is a safe and reliable minimally invasive alternative for lumbar interbody fusion in DS, even in patients with severe stenosis and previous spine surgery. It seems to offer similar results to MIS-TLIF regarding clinical results, radiological outcomes and complications.

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:
0940-6719, 1432-0932

European Spine Journal  Springer Verlag

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
3210-3217

Documentos

  • Não há documentos

Filiações mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Minimally invasive surgery; MIS-TLIF; MIDLIF

Financiamento

Proyectos asociados

Association between patient’s expectations and real outcomes for degenerative spine surgery.

Investigador Principal: Pedro Santos Silva

Estudo Clínico Académico (Spine Surgery) . 2020

Correlation between clinical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing decompression surgery

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico (Lumbar stenosis) . 2020

Are Spinopelvic Parameters predictive of low back pain 8 years later in an asymptomatic population?

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico (Spinopelvic) . 2020

Long-term outcome of redo discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniations

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico (Lumbar disc) . 2021

Is the outcome after lumbar discectomy impacted by fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles?

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

Does decompression surgery influence sagittal balance parameters in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis?

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Variation of response to questionnaires in the two weeks before surgery for lumbar disc herniation

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Does sagittal alignment influence outcome for patients who undergo anterior cervical fusion for degenerative pathologies?

Investigador Principal: Paulo Miguel da Silva Pereira

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2020

Citar a publicação

Partilhar a publicação