Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients

Data de publicação: Data Ahead of Print:

Autores da FMUP

  • José Pedro Coimbra De Vargas Lobarinhas Barbosa

    Autor

  • José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

    Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

  • Loureiro, P
  • Vale, JF

Unidades de investigação

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery.Objective: Compare laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy," "Laparoscopic," and "Robotic Surgical Procedures." The included studies compared short-term outcomes between LG and RG. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale.Results: There was no significant difference between RG and LG regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference [MD] -19.43 mL, P < .00001), length of hospital stay (MD -0.50 days, P = .0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, P < .00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, P = .0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade >= III (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, P < .0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, P = .007) were significantly lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 minutes, P < .00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 U.S. Dollars, P < .00001).Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.

Dados da publicação

ISSN/ISSNe:
1557-9034, 1092-6429

JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES  Mary Ann Liebert Inc.

Tipo:
Review
Páginas:
782-800
Link para outro recurso:
www.scopus.com

Citações Recebidas na Scopus: 5

Documentos

  • Não há documentos

Métricas

Filiações mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • gastrectomy; gastric cancer; robotic surgery; laparoscopy; short-term outcomes

Proyectos asociados

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer

Investigador Principal: José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

Estudo Clínico Académico (Chemotherapy) . 2020

Risk factors for gastric neuroendocrine tumors

Investigador Principal: José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

The Impact of Perioperative Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients With Gastric Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinoma

Investigador Principal: José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2021

Pode a regressão tumoral e ganglionar induzida pela quimioterapia perioperatória no carcinoma gástrico relacionar-se com os outcomes pós-operatórios?

Investigador Principal: José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Does neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients affect post-operative outcomes? A study using Becker TRG system and lymph node regression.

Investigador Principal: José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2022

Qualidade de vida pós-cirurgica e resultados no tratamento da acalásia

Investigador Principal: José Adelino Lobarinhas Barbosa

Estudo Clínico Académico . 2020

Citar a publicação

Partilhar a publicação