Unsupervised algorithms to identify potential under-coding of secondary diagnoses in hospitalisations databases in Portugal

Data de publicação: 17/02/2023 Data Ahead of Print: 01/02/2023

Autores da FMUP

• Diana Leite Portela Silva

  Autor

• Pedro Pereira Rodrigues

  Autor

• José Alberto Da Silva Freitas

  Autor

• João De Almeida Lopes Da Fonseca

  Autor

• Bernardo Manuel De Sousa Pinto

  Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

• Amaral, R.
• Costa, E.

Unidades de investigação

• Laboratório Associado RISE- Rede de Investigação em Saúde

  

  Investigador

  Fernando Carlos De Landér Schmitt

• Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde

• RISE-Health

  

  Investigador

  Fernando Carlos De Landér Schmitt

Abstract

Background Quantifying and dealing with lack of consistency in administrative databases (namely, under-coding) requires tracking patients longitudinally without compromising anonymity, which is often a challenging task. Objective This study aimed to (i) assess and compare different hierarchical clustering methods on the identification of individual patients in an administrative database that does not easily allow tracking of episodes from the same patient; (ii) quantify the frequency of potential under-coding; and (iii) identify factors associated with such phenomena. Method We analysed the Portuguese National Hospital Morbidity Dataset, an administrative database registering all hospitalisations occurring in Mainland Portugal between 2011-2015. We applied different approaches of hierarchical clustering methods (either isolated or combined with partitional clustering methods), to identify potential individual patients based on demographic variables and comorbidities. Diagnoses codes were grouped into the Charlson an Elixhauser comorbidity defined groups. The algorithm displaying the best performance was used to quantify potential under-coding. A generalised mixed model (GML) of binomial regression was applied to assess factors associated with such potential under-coding. Results We observed that the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) + k-means clustering method with comorbidities grouped according to the Charlson defined groups was the algorithm displaying the best performance (with a Rand Index of 0.99997). We identified potential under-coding in all Charlson comorbidity groups, ranging from 3.5% (overall diabetes) to 27.7% (asthma). Overall, being male, having medical admission, dying during hospitalisation or being admitted at more specific and complex hospitals were associated with increased odds of potential under-coding. Discussion We assessed several approaches to identify individual patients in an administrative database and, subsequently, by applying HCA + k-means algorithm, we tracked coding inconsistency and potentially improved data quality. We reported consistent potential under-coding in all defined groups of comorbidities and potential factors associated with such lack of completeness. Conclusion Our proposed methodological framework could both enhance data quality and act as a reference for other studies relying on databases with similar problems.

Keywords

• data quality; public health informatics; medical records; evaluation; health information management; under-coding; comorbidities; administrative database; clustering algorithms; unsupervised machine learning