Left Ventricular Myocardial and Cavity Velocity Disturbances Are Powerful Predictors of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis

Autores da FMUP

• Carla Maria De Moura Lopes

  Autor

Participantes de fora da FMUP

• Bytyci, Ibadete
• Alves, Liliana
• Alves, Oscar
• Bajraktari, Gani
• Henein, Michael Y.

Unidades de investigação

• Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses, e Educação Médica

Abstract

Background and Aim: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a well-established noninvasive investigation for significant coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cardiac Doppler parameters in predicting CAD. Methods: We prospectively studied 103 consecutive patients with suspected CAD based on typical symptoms; 59 proved to have CAD, and 44 patients proved to have no-CAD (n = 44). All patients underwent a complete stress Doppler echocardiographic examination. Total isovolumic time (T-IVT) as a marker of cavity dyssynchrony and wall motion score index (WMSI) were also calculated. Results: At peak dobutamine stress, the compromised LV longitudinal excursion (MAPSE), systolic septal and lateral velocities (s'), and diastolic indices were more pronounced in the CAD patients compared with those without CAD, but LV dimension did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). The WMSI was higher and t-IVT more prolonged in patients with CAD (p < 0.01 for both). Similarly, the changes were more pronounced in patients with significant CAD compared with insignificant CAD. On multivariate model, Delta mean s', OR 2.016 (1.610 to 3.190; p < 0.001), Delta E velocity OR 2.502 (1.179 to 1.108; p < 0.001), Delta t-IVT 2.206 (1.180 to 2.780; p < 0.001) and Delta WMSI OR 1.911 (1.401 to 3.001; p = 0.001) were the most powerful independent predictors of the presence of CAD, particularly when significant (>75%). Delta mean s' < 5.0 was 85% sensitive, 89% specific with AUC 0.92. Respective values for Delta E velocity <6.0 cm/s were 82%, 90% and 0.91; for Delta t-IVT > 4.5, 78%, 77% and 0.81 and for Delta FT >= 150 ms, 76%, 78% and 0.84 in predicating significant CAD. WMSI >= 0.7 was 75% sensitive, 77% specific with AUC of 0.81 in predicting significant CAD. The accuracy of DSE was higher in significant CAD compared to insignificant CAD (80% vs. 74%; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Compromised LV longitudinal systolic function, lower delta E wave, prolonged t-IVT, and increased WMSI were the most powerful independent predictors of the presence and significance of CAD. These finding strengthen the role of comprehensive DSE analysis in diagnosing ischemic disturbances secondary to significant CAD.

Keywords

• suspected coronary artery disease; insignificant coronary artery disease; dobutamine stress echocardiography